Ridikzappa 12:14 Sun Dec 29
Paolo Di Canio
|
|
Time for the prodigal son to return and bring the glory and pride back to the Hammer’s faithful.
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
D.B Cooper
4:12 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Trevor Brooking should be handed the reigns again for the rest of the season. Couldn’t do any worse than the other cunts being suggested. At least he is a gentlemen, commands respect and is West Ham through and through. About the only positive thing associated with West Ham now. Did alright in his last temporary spell. Whoever gets the poisoned chalice is going to have some fucking job getting an unbalanced misfit side away from the relegation zone and working under the Dildo bros and Brady
|
Alex G
1:43 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Di Canio? It's a Di Cani-no from me!
|
Lato
10:17 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
It would at least liven things up at the soul less popcorn bowl
|
Pagey
2:22 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
I’m not really sure what’s happening any more so I’ll bid you goodnight.
|
gph
2:19 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Obviously the right man for a tomato ketchup-free West Ham.
“You have a specific diet in England and you can have a lot of ketchup and mayonnaise. I don’t think it’s a big sacrifice to help your stomach and liver to work better because it is your body system that helps you have less injuries, better performances in training sessions and to prepare yourself for the best match you can.”
|
chelmsfordhammer
2:17 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
pagey, people with passion don't regularly cry off when we were playing up North, great player when he could be bothered but not fit to lace the real hammers boots such as Brooking , bonds and martin, players that never failed to turn up, never caused a scene and just got on and played for us.
But sorry i forgot he gave you some of your best memories so he must have really cared about the club.
The only thing Paolo really cares about like most professional footballers these days is himself.
|
Jasnik
2:12 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Errr No!.
|
Pagey
2:09 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Chelmsford, I don’t think you even know what you’re banging on about now. You’re all over the shop.
I personally believe that Di Canio gives a fuck about West Ham. If you don’t then that’s fine, that’s your opinion. For me, you don’t show the amount of passion as he did, for as long as he did, when you don’t give a fuck.
I’m not really sure what all the other bullshit was for. You seemed to think I was lauding him as our new manager when that would be moronic.
|
zebthecat
2:00 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Good grief, what a moronic suggestion.
He was a fucking disaster of a manager. If you fancy a guaranteed relegation and a restructure of the club then fair enough.
|
chelmsfordhammer
1:57 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
No but others have said that.
You just seem to believe that because he gave you some of your best memories that he must give a fuck about the club, as I’ve already said that either makes you very naive or stupid, I’m not sure what one it is.
|
blueeyed.handsomeman
1:57 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo DI CANIO
|
Paolo is a fan ,leave it there,he is no more suitable as a manager than sulli is as a director.
we have terry brown as honorary life president which is totally unsuitable.
Totally suitable and appropriate is naming BONDS as our honorary life president and for the owners to hire some professional directors who can hire a coach to manage all football matters
|
Side of Ham
1:53 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
I loved some of DiCanios momentous bits of magic for West Ham but why want a manager who has ‘walk away’ or ‘goes awol’ as a mainstay of his character, he may have bundles of passion but that exceeds this ability to stand and be counted and often makes his decisions flaky at best.
|
Pagey
1:52 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Not once have I said that he should be our new manager. In fact it would be ridiculous to even consider it.
Maybe you should read things properly and you might not continually talk absolute shit?
|
chelmsfordhammer
1:50 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Pagey, why’s that , because I don’t fawn like a school kid over a professional footballer and believe that because he gave me some great memories means he loves West Ham and should be our next manager even though he hasn’t managed for six years and failed miserably at his last job.
|
Pagey
1:45 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
*There
|
Pagey
1:45 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Yeah, because that’s what I said didn’t I?
They’re are some major fuckwits on this forum but you’ve just been installed as the king.
King Fuckwit.
|
chelmsfordhammer
1:43 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Pagey, fucking hell, billy bonds didn’t give a fuck about West Ham , I’ll leave it there, you’re embarrassing yourself now.
|
Pagey
1:39 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Chelmsford, is that the same Bonds who went on to manage Millwall? Before you jump all over that, Bonds loves West Ham.
This isn’t even a debate. You’re completely wrong. It’s as simple as that. Laughably wrong.
|
Yorkammer
1:39 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo DI CANIO
|
Anyone suggesting PDC is almost certainly on a wind up. Failing that, they are a dribbling mong.
|
chelmsfordhammer
1:36 Sun Dec 29
Re: Paolo Di Canio
|
Pagey, no you implied that because he gave you some of your greatest memories it somehow means he gives a fuck about West Ham , if that’s the case payet must give a fuck about West Ham as well.
Anyone that thinks that the modern day player really gives a fuck about the team they play for is either a fucking mong or extremely naive, I’m not sure what one you are yet.
People like brooking , bonds and Martin give a fuck about West Ham for the likes of di canio we are just the club where he played his best football, that’s when he could be bothered to play.
|
| 
